The matter of Paul’s death according to the third century Christian philosopher, Ammonius of Alexandria, and two other writers.
Ammonius was trying to dispel a misunderstanding of the Herod dynasty about the timelines of Christ and Paul. Both are interesting but the history he ascribes to Paul is especially intriguing.
The following translation has a little crossover of John Chrysostom and some influence by the eleventh century writer, Theophylacti of Bulgaria. It appears from a very informal look that most of this is penned by the hand of Ammonius.
The following is a rough translation provided by me:
Why is he freely given over to the Jews? It was both an entire region and a whole city. For this reason, Paul was threatened by it, being subjected to armed men, ““I stand at the tribunal of Caesar, where I ought to be tried.”(1)Acts 25:10 I wish to depart before him, to the King in Rome, and in that place to be judged. I summons you,” he says. It shows that he rightly called upon Caesar. Even if they had nothing terrible to put forward, yet these people of the region were fixated, for obvious reasons he departs for Caesar. So in the meantime while awaiting judgment, the plan devised against him by the Jews was meaningless.
Whether Agrippa came into the power of king and because of this was called a king, or that perhaps he was the king of the eastern regions, while Nero ruled the western regions and lived in Rome. For the name Caesar in Rome means king, as all the kings of Rome are to be commonly called by the name Caesar and insofar as much as kings — however, their designated names are definitely not to be equivocal ones.
Consequently, I say this, that no one ought to suppose from the general commonality of the name that the Lord was born under his kingship, and Paul died.
So the Lord was born during the times shown under Augustus Caesar and afterward died after 32 years(2) The Theophylacti Bulgariae text changes this to 33. MPG. Vol. 125. Col. 1123 under Tiberius Caesar. Paul died under Nero, 22 years after the death of the Lord. But rather Herod, as Agrippa, had come to the power of a king and, therefore, was called a king.(3)As taken from: Amonii Alexandrinii, Fragmenta in Acta Apostolorum, MPG. Vol. 85. col 1593: Catena in Acta SS. Apostolorum. J. A Cramer, S.T.P. Oxonii. 1838. Pg. 384 Theophylacti Bulgariae Archiep. Expositionis in Acta Tertius.Vol 125 Col. 1124.
If one can use the traditional date of 29 A.D. as the year of Christ’s crucifixion, which is arguably one of the more consistent year values in the life of Christ, then Paul died in 51 A.D under the rulership of Nero.
I haven’t studied the literary sources on Paul’s death outside of the texts used here. However, it is a very interesting reference.
For more information on the problem of dating Christ’s birth or the challenge of correlating ancient dating systems with modern calendars, see the full range of articles found at: Christian Calendar Systems.
References [ + ]
|2.||↑||The Theophylacti Bulgariae text changes this to 33. MPG. Vol. 125. Col. 1123|
|3.||↑||As taken from: Amonii Alexandrinii, Fragmenta in Acta Apostolorum, MPG. Vol. 85. col 1593: Catena in Acta SS. Apostolorum. J. A Cramer, S.T.P. Oxonii. 1838. Pg. 384 Theophylacti Bulgariae Archiep. Expositionis in Acta Tertius.Vol 125 Col. 1124.|